[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice aga
From: |
Dave Pawson |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:55:42 +0100 |
On 23/09/2007, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> If I break my arm it is also more flexible. The question is what
> tanglible, user-visible benefit you expect to be coming from the
> purported added flexibility.
Forget it David. Wouldn't want to upset you.
>
> You are proposing to have a lot of work done
No, I was offering to do a lot of work.
>
> >> I guess too many developpers actually use Texinfo to document their
> >> code, and both users and developpers seem to be happy with that.
> >
> > You may be right. I think it is worth challenging though, otherwise
> > we'll never progress?
>
> Progress without aim is just activism. You need to balance benefits
> and efforts.
Against stagnation.
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, (continued)
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Bastien, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Dave Pawson, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Bastien, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again, Tom Tromey, 2007/09/23
- Re: Emacs documentation., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Dave Pawson, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Peter Dyballa, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/09/29
- Re: Emacs documentation., Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/29
- Message not available