[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Info-mode and ido
From: |
William Xu |
Subject: |
Re: Info-mode and ido |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:05:09 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2.50 (darwin) |
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> A difference is that Ido shows candidates in the minibuffer and Icicles does
> not, but that is not a major UI difference. (And you can use Icicles with
> icomplete[+].el.)
Thanks for pointing out. (I guess mastering Icicles must be tough...)
That works more like ido, only very slow. I did some tests with
icy-mode and icomplete-mode on. It(switching buffers, selecting nodes
in Info-mode) usually takes around 0.5~1 second for the completions to
appear in minibuffer, on a 2.2GHz, Intel Core 2 Due macbook.
> So don't open it. You never need to show *Completions*. You say that you don't
> look at the candidates list in Ido's minibuffer anyway, so you apparently
> don't
> need to see any candidates.
Hehe, i'm sorry didn't address it well. I do look at candidates list in
Ido. It's still the distraction thing.
--
William
http://williamxu.net9.org
- RE: Info-mode and ido, (continued)
- RE: Info-mode and ido, Drew Adams, 2008/03/29
- RE: Info-mode and ido, Drew Adams, 2008/03/30
- Re: Info-mode and ido, William Xu, 2008/03/30
- RE: Info-mode and ido, Drew Adams, 2008/03/30
- Re: Info-mode and ido, William Xu, 2008/03/30
- RE: Info-mode and ido, Drew Adams, 2008/03/30
- Re: Info-mode and ido,
William Xu <=
- RE: Info-mode and ido, Drew Adams, 2008/03/31