[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: condition-case
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: condition-case |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:34:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> Here's what Pascal posted originally. I tested it a little and it seems
> to work OK; it's basically syntactic sugar but pretty pleasant. We
> should also consider `handler-bind' which is like `handler-case' but
> executes handlers directly. Pascal, do you have an implementation of
> that as well?
There's no condition-bind to wrap over.
I'm not sure it would be possible to implement handler-bind without
patching the virtual machine.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
- Re: condition-case, (continued)
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Elena, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/09
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/10
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/10
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/15
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/16
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Elena, 2010/12/09