|
From: | ken |
Subject: | Re: Issues with emacs |
Date: | Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:54:06 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120424 Thunderbird/10.0.4 |
On 06/24/2012 02:39 AM rusi wrote:
On Jun 24, 7:39 am, ken<geb...@mousecar.com> wrote:5. Make the elisp documentation and tutorials so easy and fun to learn that tons of people actually want to write code.When I first started reading the emacs/elisp docs around 93 I found them a model of clarity. Has that changed much? I dont think so .... tl;dr version: Saying that emacs manuals are not fun and easy to learn is wrong. Its just that reading them feels like 1980
I got into computers long before 1980... and read computer manuals back in the '70s just for fun-- even though I didn't then have a computer or access to one.
That said, please note that I was referring to *elisp* and never mentioned *emacs*. These are two quite different subjects and equating them and/or their documentation-- to borrow a phrase-- is just wrong.
The topic was emacs development and how to encourage it. This requires a knowledge of /elisp/. In the confusion the point I made was lost, so I'll say it again: To encourage development, there could be better elisp documentation and tutorials.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |