[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process inste
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP) |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:21:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:
> Newsreaders construct threads from the references, i.e., every
> article mentions its ancestor articles. Since the references in
> your articles are wrong, every followup you make creates a new
> thread instead of being displayed as a child of the article you
> are replying to.
Really? To be such a serious bug, it sure took a long while to get
to the surface!
And how can it be that *I* see the threads (including my posts)
correctly?
I didn't do that much Gnus configuration. What I did, I collected
at the URL, last.
But you already gave me some hints as to where I will start to
look.
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/gnus/index.html
--
emanuel Berg - programmer (hire me! CV below)
computer projects: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
internet activity: http://home.student.uu.se/embe8573
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, (continued)
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/09
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, John Leach, 2013/07/12
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/15
- Message not available
- [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/15
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/16
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/17
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP),
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/23
Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Barry Margolin, 2013/07/09