[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:24:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> Format the documentation string so that it fits in an Emacs
> window on an 80-column screen. It is a good idea for most lines
> to be no wider than 60 characters.
It seems, I have a 70-column (or char) screen when using Emacs, so
if people stuck to the "good idea", that'd work for me. But the
line I mentioned (in the documentation of find-file) is below the
hard-limit of 80 chars, so I can't really bang them in the head
with the above quote, can I?
> `emacs-lisp-docstring-fill-column'
Cool, will check that out!
> It sometimes happens that someone writes a doc string that is
> too wide. That is what `M-x report-emacs-bug' is for.
You always tell me I should report all problems as bugs. I don't
think that is a good attitude, I rather examine how to fix the
problem myself. So you don't need to repeat that all the
time. Only if I find really obvious bugs, I'll report them, and
you don't need to tell me to. I stopped go on and on about the
mouse, remember? So relax. But I appreciate the other info you
provided. Or, put it like this: Thanks for the -- help.
--
Emanuel Berg - programmer (hire me! CV below)
computer projects: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
internet activity: http://home.student.uu.se/embe8573
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, W. Greenhouse, 2013/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/28
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kevin Montuori, 2013/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/28
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/28
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, W. Greenhouse, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/30
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, MBR, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/30
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Ludwig, Mark, 2013/08/30
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/30
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto, 2013/08/29