[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:18:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnu.org> writes:
> I mean, is there work on such a tool being carried
> out, which I am unaware of?
>
> You can grep the net for "emacsy", which is not a
> particular program per se, but a component that could
> go into programs.
That project must be in its absolute infancy because
there isn't even a Wikipedia page on it. I have no idea
what it is all about, but I am prepared to swallow
poison that Emacs, without the text editor, for
non-textual applications, will *never* replace my Emacs.
But I confess, I *was* "thinking in Emacs" back when I
still used X. Whenever I wanted something to happen, I
always thought I'd add a hook, or make two events into
one by stacking them in a defun, just for a split
second...
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Tom Davey, 2013/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, henry atting, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2013/10/11
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/04
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/08
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12