[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Rustom Mody |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:36:03 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 3:31:55 AM UTC+5:30, Christopher Ritsen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:06:54PM +0100, Phillip Lord wrote:
>
> > But, as I say, there are more programmers than ever; I suspect that actual
> > number of Emacs users is increasing. Especially since org-mode got invented
> > which is bringing in lots of people.
>
> org-mode is the reason I started using emacs and was completely worth it. I
> use
> both vim (2.5 years) and emacs (4 months) every day, which seems to be
> extremely
> uncommon. (this is my first post to a listserv, let me know if I'm doing it
> wrong.)
Hi Christopher!
Good to hear your voice -- you are welcome here!
What do you use emacs/vi for?
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/14
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/14
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Christopher Ritsen, 2013/10/14
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/14
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Bob Proulx, 2013/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/15
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/16
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Rustom Mody <=
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Carson Chittom, 2013/10/10
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/10
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/10/11
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Bob Proulx, 2013/10/11
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/10/12
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/10/11