[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs slow on dired renaming
From: |
Robert Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: emacs slow on dired renaming |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:09:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, Apr 05 2014, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Robert Marshall <spam@capuchin.co.uk>
>> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:50:09 +0100
>>
>> > If you try renaming a single file with "M-x rename-file RET", does it
>> > also take 2 sec?
>> >
>> There's no apparent delay
>
> On a restart or in a session where moving from Dired is already very
> slow? If the latter, then the actual file I/O is not the reason for
> the slowdown, and I suggest to selectively disable portions of your
> ~/.emacs to find out what causes this.
In the session which is slow when using dired to rename
> It could be frequent GC, for
> example (set garbage-collection-messages non-nil to see if it is), or
> something else that causes excessive processing. Or maybe you have a
> lot of buffers visiting files in a directory being renamed, in which
> case Dired will loop over all those files and rename their
> default-directory, which could be expensive for a very large number of
> such buffers.
The files which I'm renaming are all jpg's so there's no directories at
all in the file moving operation, could a soft link to that directory
have an effect (though in that case why doesn't it happen when emacs is
first started)?
>
> Btw, I don't understand this part of your profile:
>
> - dired-in-this-tree 10841 38%
> + let 23 0%
>
> This says that dired-in-this-tree takes 1/3rd of the run time. But
> dired-in-this-tree is just this:
>
> (defun dired-in-this-tree (file dir)
> ;;"Is FILE part of the directory tree starting at DIR?"
> (let (case-fold-search)
> (string-match-p (concat "^" (regexp-quote dir)) file)))
>
> So I wonder how come it takes such a large proportion of the time.
>
> As another possible hint, does the number of times dired-create-files
> is called (26704) make sense? Do you really have such a large number
> of files in the tree you are moving? Can you produce a profile for
> moving a single file (which you say takes about 2 sec)?
>
This then (26704) - as you see from my comment about the jpg's which are
the only files being moved - doesn't appear to make any sense - I didn't
realise that number was the number of times the function was called. 10
files only are being moved none of which are directories, none of them
are links to other files
Here's moving a single file (using 'R' in a dired buffer) - the full trace
rather than just a
selection from the report (again a jpg) from ~/Pictures to
~/Pictures/yy; 1083 calls to dired-do-rename(!). Could there be some
recursive calls somehow, why is command-execute being called 1227 times?!
- command-execute 1227 97%
- call-interactively 1227 97%
- dired-do-rename 1083 86%
- dired-do-create-files 1083 86%
- dired-create-files 962 76%
- byte-code 952 75%
- dired-rename-file 766 61%
- dired-rename-subdir 568 45%
- dired-fun-in-all-buffers 180 14%
dired-buffers-for-dir 180 14%
- dired-remove-file 194 15%
- dired-fun-in-all-buffers 194 15%
dired-buffers-for-dir 186 14%
- apply 8 0%
+ dired-remove-entry 8 0%
- dired-add-file 182 14%
- dired-fun-in-all-buffers 182 14%
dired-buffers-for-dir 178 14%
- apply 4 0%
+ dired-add-entry 4 0%
+ dired-file-marker 10 0%
- dired-mark-read-file-name 107 8%
- dired-mark-pop-up 107 8%
- apply 107 8%
- read-file-name 107 8%
- read-file-name-default 107 8%
- completing-read 99 7%
- completing-read-default 99 7%
- read-from-minibuffer 96 7%
+ timer-event-handler 1 0%
dired-get-marked-files 4 0%
- byte-code 123 9%
- read-extended-command 123 9%
- completing-read 123 9%
- completing-read-default 123 9%
- read-from-minibuffer 108 8%
- timer-event-handler 3 0%
- byte-code 3 0%
- apply 3 0%
jit-lock-context-fontify 2 0%
+ minibuffer-complete 15 1%
+ execute-extended-command 6 0%
- timer-event-handler 20 1%
- byte-code 13 1%
- apply 13 1%
- which-func-update 12 0%
- which-func-update-1 12 0%
- byte-code 12 0%
- which-function 12 0%
- add-log-current-defun 12 0%
byte-code 4 0%
timer-activate 3 0%
- redisplay_internal (C function) 7 0%
- jit-lock-function 7 0%
- jit-lock-fontify-now 7 0%
- funcall 7 0%
- #<compiled 0xb436117> 7 0%
- run-hook-with-args 7 0%
- font-lock-fontify-region 7 0%
font-lock-default-fontify-region 7 0%
- ... 0 0%
Automatic GC 0 0%
I've looked at pre-command-hook and post-command-hook and there doesn't
appear to be anything suspicious there (tooltip-hide and font-lock- fns)
In a session with no apparent slowdown, on a single dired-do-rename,
the function dired-do-rename gets called 42 times
Robert
--
La grenouille songe..dans son château d'eau
Links and things http://rmstar.blogspot.com/
- emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/03
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/03
- Message not available
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/03
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/03
- Message not available
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/04
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/04
- Message not available
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/05
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/05
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Stefan Monnier, 2014/04/05
- Message not available
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/05
- Message not available
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming,
Robert Marshall <=
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/05
- Message not available
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/05
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/06
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/06
- Message not available
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/06
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/09
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/09
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Stefan Monnier, 2014/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: emacs slow on dired renaming, Robert Marshall, 2014/04/09