[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RTF for emacs
From: |
regcl |
Subject: |
Re: RTF for emacs |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2014 11:35:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Robert Thorpe <rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com> writes:
> As others have mentioned I'll try Org and Markdown too.
I have used both. If you want the emacs-centric solution, I highly
recommend org mode, which I found was easy to get started with and much
more scaleable in terms of leveraging emacs. FWIW, my primary
motivation for markdown was Github, but now Github handles org mode, so
I no longer need markdown.
I recently completed a medical journal manuscript using org mode with R
computation results flowing up into the document. I successfully shared
many intermediate results with colleges in PDF along the way and the
final draft via MSword.
- Re: RTF for emacs, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
- Re: RTF for emacs, Charles Philip Chan, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Charles Philip Chan, 2014/05/25
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
Re: RTF for emacs, Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/27
Re: RTF for emacs, Hans BKK, 2014/05/29