[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?
From: |
Rusi |
Subject: |
Re: Build Emacs without Lisp? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jun 2016 04:54:41 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 7:10:28 PM UTC+5:30, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> I'm working in a Debian S/390x Chroot (https://www.debian.org/ports/).
> Its a lightweight VM-like command line environment.
>
> I'm trying to build emacs from sources because the port does not have
> a suitable package available. The features I need are (a) Open file
> (b) Save file (c) Search in buffer and (d) Replace in buffer.
> Everything else is superfluous. Below is my Configure line.
>
> Things are dying during 'make install':
>
> Using load-path (/root/emacs-24.5/lisp
> /root/emacs-24.5/lisp/emacs-lisp /root/emacs-24.5/lisp/language
> /root/emacs-24.5/lisp/international /root/emacs-24.5/lisp/textmodes
> /root/emacs-24.5/lisp/vc)
> Loading emacs-lisp/byte-run...
> /bin/bash: line 7: 23039 Segmentation fault ./temacs --batch
> --load loadup bootstrap
> Makefile:815: recipe for target 'bootstrap-emacs' failed
> make[1]: *** [bootstrap-emacs] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/emacs-24.5/src'
> Makefile:387: recipe for target 'src' failed
> make: *** [src] Error 2
>
> Fixing bugs in Debian does not move as quickly as one would hope. And
> I have observed fixing them in a port moves even slower. Additionally,
> GDB usually suffers some degree of not-working-ness.
>
> I'd like to try skipping LISP since I don't use it. Configure does not
> discuss disgorging Lisp:
>
> ./configure --help | grep -i lisp
> --enable-locallisppath=PATH
> directories Emacs should search for lisp files
> --enable-check-lisp-object-type
> enable compile time checks for the Lisp_Object data
>
> My questions are:
>
> - Is it possible to build emacs without Lisp? If so, how?
>
> - Are there other work arounds available for the seg fault?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> ----------
>
> ./configure --with-xml2 --with-zlib --without-x --without-sound
> --without-xpm --without-jpeg --without-tiff --without-gif
> --without-png --without-rsvg --without-imagemagick --without-xft
> --without-libotf --without-m17n-flt --without-xaw3d
> --without-toolkit-scroll-bars --without-gpm --without-dbus
> --without-gconf --without-gsettings --without-makeinfo
Taking your subject line literally (ie not the usual way its done today
to suggest emacs = gnu-emacs)
have you seen this list of 'smaller' emacsen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs#Various_Emacs_editors
- Build Emacs without Lisp?, Jeffrey Walton, 2016/06/25
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/25
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2016/06/25
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?,
Rusi <=
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Jeffrey Walton, 2016/06/26
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Klaus Schilling, 2016/06/26
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Phillip Lord, 2016/06/26
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Jeffrey Walton, 2016/06/26
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Phillip Lord, 2016/06/26
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Jeffrey Walton, 2016/06/26
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Phillip Lord, 2016/06/26
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Jeffrey Walton, 2016/06/26
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Phillip Lord, 2016/06/27
- Message not available
- Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?, Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/27