[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1L?
From: |
Van L |
Subject: |
Re: 1L? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2019 21:31:52 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> I am unfamiliar with the term "1L", and Google wasn't much help. What
>> does it mean beyond "one liter"?
> I think he meant just that: one liter, i.e. an approximate upper limit
> on the size of the machine.
I picked it up from the Lenovo brochureware techspecs. Perhaps this
capacity measure has origin in watercooling. The specs mention
certification for independent software vendors and that I expect means
chances are better for Debian and the like to "just work".
> Shouldn't *all* "1L machines" run Emacs
> just fine?
It takes quite a while for gnus to process L117196 on entry to
gmane.emacs.help. And, multitasking is impossible while this is
busy. A 6core cpu with HT won't make a difference to the 4core without
HT in performance, here.
> Anyway the RPi, even including the case, should
> be way below the 1L constraint
The worry is RPi's hobbykit won't cool adequately. The bits and pieces
wearout quick, for example, the SD card, &c, &c.
--
© 2019 Van L
gpg using EEF2 37E9 3840 0D5D 9183 251E 9830 384E 9683 B835
"Where is the letter T?" -Joni Mitchell
- 1L? (was: Suggestions for 1L computer to run Emacs 2019), Skip Montanaro, 2019/02/06
- Re: 1L?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/06
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/06
- Re: 1L?,
Van L <=
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Vladimir Sedach, 2019/02/08
- Message not available
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Van L, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08