[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1L?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: 1L? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:42:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Van L wrote:
>> Shouldn't *all* "1L machines" run Emacs
>> just fine?
>
> It takes quite a while for gnus to process
> L117196 on entry to gmane.emacs.help. And,
> multitasking is impossible while this is
> busy. A 6core cpu with HT won't make
> a difference to the 4core without HT in
> performance, here.
What is "L117196"? For me, it doesn't take many
seconds to enter a newsgroup after the initial
reading is done. You can even cancel all the
messages after being absent for some time.
That will be even faster.
>> Anyway the RPi, even including the case,
>> should be way below the 1L constraint
>
> The worry is RPi's hobbykit won't cool
> adequately. The bits and pieces wearout
> quick, for example, the SD card, &c, &c.
Well, like I said, mine is from 2015.
Maybe I got it in 2016. Still runs. But the SD
card, and in particular swap space, can be
a problem, which is why I don't really
recommend the RPi as a development platform.
This doesn't mean you can't do programming on
it, and I've done tons. But a full-size
computer with plain Debian is probably better.
Which also makes sense.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: 1L?, (continued)
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Vladimir Sedach, 2019/02/08
- Message not available
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Van L, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: 1L?, Van L, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, tomas, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, tomas, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Van L, 2019/02/10
- Re: 1L?, tomas, 2019/02/10
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/10
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/10
- Re: 1L?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08