[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: Morally equivalent
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: Morally equivalent |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:20:52 +0200 |
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 03:02:31PM +0000, Drew Adams wrote:
> > > > > What is a 'moral equivalence' in Emacs Lisp?
> > >
> > > Probably just meant "no better or worse" (and not morally).
> >
> > Could it be that the writer of that docstring had
> >
> > ... is NORMALLY equivalent ...
> >
> > in mind?
>
> Yes, could well be. Maybe accidental. More likely
> intentional, as Michael offered: "Only that kind of
> slightly funny language Stefan sometimes uses I guess."
Actually, I knew "moral equivalence" as a sloppy and idiomatic
way of stating "equivalent under some criteria of interest in
the current context" (of course, the criteria and the context
are left unspecified ;-)
The discussion led me to some research [1], and yikes. That
rabbit hole was dark and deep indeed...
Cheers
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_equivalent
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Morally equivalent, Bob Newell, 2022/10/16
- RE: [External] : Re: Morally equivalent, Drew Adams, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Christopher Dimech, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Christopher Dimech, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Eduardo Ochs, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Dr Rainer Woitok, 2022/10/18