[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Morally equivalent
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: Morally equivalent |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:10:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Christopher Dimech <dimech@gmx.com> writes:
> It is just political nonsense pushed into software. An introductory
> textbook for beginning undergraduates is never serious. And even
> if it was serious, morality does not work. Either it is equivalent,
> or it is not. There is no morality in it.
I was not familiar with that term (doesn't appear in German) but
understood the doc perfectly. OTOH, if the text said
This is not equivalent to (setf PLACE (cons NEWELT PLACE))
I would not have understood (and it is _not_ equivalent).
Until someone comes with a better wording we should stop the
Stefan-bashing. Read it as "equivalent in some sense", and good. It's
a text, ok, not a computer program controlling the city traffic.
Michael.
- Re: Morally equivalent, (continued)
Re: Morally equivalent, Bob Newell, 2022/10/16
- RE: [External] : Re: Morally equivalent, Drew Adams, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Christopher Dimech, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: Morally equivalent, Christopher Dimech, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Eduardo Ochs, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/16
- Re: Morally equivalent, Dr Rainer Woitok, 2022/10/18
Re: Morally equivalent, Christopher Dimech, 2022/10/16
Re: Morally equivalent, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/10/16
Re: Morally equivalent, Christopher Dimech, 2022/10/16
Re: Morally equivalent, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/10/16
Re: Morally equivalent, Christopher Dimech, 2022/10/16