Re: package for Email

[Milan Glacier]

On 01/19/23 16:20, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 Jan 2023 at 15:10, Martin Steffen wrote:
> > I agree (but qualified). I used RMAIL when I started with emacs (long
> > time ago, and I think I used other emacs email software), gnus is way
> > more versatile. One thing that may speak against it is it can be
> > complex.
>
> +1 having gone from RMAIL to VM to wl to gnus (with mutt somewhere in
> the middle).
>
> > Actually, I started having troubles locally, after my organization did
> > no longer supported IMAP properly (which as a consequence mean, all
> > email clients/user programs work excellently as long as they are called
> > outlook).
>
> I've had the same problem including 2FA introduced two years ago.  I'm
> using davmail as an intermediary to ensure I can keep using gnus.  Works
> well.

Have a try on Davmail? Davmail works as a mediator (an local IMAP
server) that exchanges with remote server and then forward to your MUA. And
it supports at least 2FA for office365 email accounts.