[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package for Email
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: package for Email |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:20:18 +0000 |
User-agent: |
gnus (Emacs 30.0.50) |
On Thursday, 19 Jan 2023 at 15:10, Martin Steffen wrote:
> I agree (but qualified). I used RMAIL when I started with emacs (long
> time ago, and I think I used other emacs email software), gnus is way
> more versatile. One thing that may speak against it is it can be
> complex.
+1 having gone from RMAIL to VM to wl to gnus (with mutt somewhere in
the middle).
> Actually, I started having troubles locally, after my organization did
> no longer supported IMAP properly (which as a consequence mean, all
> email clients/user programs work excellently as long as they are called
> outlook).
I've had the same problem including 2FA introduced two years ago. I'm
using davmail as an intermediary to ensure I can keep using gnus. Works
well.
--
Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2022-12-05) on Debian 11.5
Re: package for Email, Eric Brown, 2023/01/19
Re: package for Email, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/19
Re: package for Email, Milan Glacier, 2023/01/20