[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 21:15:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> - Why is our native-compile just 7% faster than our
> byte-compile? I is still based on the byte-model, just now
> adopted for native hardware?
*Is it
> Is all Elisp shipped with Emacs natively compiled?
Here you understand what I mean, but it should say: will
it be?
No code shipped with Emacs is natively compiled, as that
happens on the native computer.
But it happens when Emacs is run and when the Elisp is
`required' from another Elisp file that is itself already
natively compiled, so if the Elisp is just loaded with
`load-file', it won't happen.
How can I natively compile _all_ Elisp, my own from the
Makefile when byte-compiling, and all other Elisp just once
and for all since I don't change that? (By all means, the
after change-thing don't have to be disabled or anything as
those method are not contradictory, on the ... contrary.)
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/14
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Chen Zhaoyang, 2023/02/15
- full native compile (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/15
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Jean Louis, 2023/02/16
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/16
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Jean Louis, 2023/02/17
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/19
- Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Madhu, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21