[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control
From: |
al davis |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:47:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Saturday 01 December 2007, a r wrote:
> I think default settings for the time-step control are too
> aggressive.
>
> I am getting best results with the following settings:
>
> .option method=euler dtmin=1e-16 reltol=1e-4 itl3=3 itl4=4
>
> .tran 1n 20n trace alltime > inverter_test.dat
>
> If I do not specify low thresholds for itl3, itl4 gnucap has
> a tendency to use maximum allowed time steps (here 1n) and
> "jump over" all interesting transistions.
The real problem is that some devices don't trigger events
properly. I know what to do, just haven't done it yet.
The "pulse" function is one of them.
"method=euler" disables the truncation error part of step
control.
In this case, tightening tolerance will get you by.
- [Help-gnucap] Time step control, a r, 2007/12/01
- [Help-gnucap] Re: Time step control, a r, 2007/12/01
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control,
al davis <=
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, a r, 2007/12/01
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, al davis, 2007/12/01
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, al davis, 2007/12/03
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, a r, 2007/12/03
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, a r, 2007/12/03
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, al davis, 2007/12/03
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, a r, 2007/12/03
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, al davis, 2007/12/03
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, a r, 2007/12/03
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Time step control, al davis, 2007/12/03