[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
From: |
Jeroen Dekkers |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles) |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:16:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:45:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Richard Kreuter <kreuter@ausar.rutgers.edu> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:24:07PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > >
> > > /var is for data that cannot be shared between different machines.
> >
> > /var/mail, /var/spool/news are shareable, no?
> >
> > The FHS states /var is for "variable" files.
>
> FHS != GNU Coding Standards.
>
> FHS finally discovered that they needed a place for shareable data,
> and then broke the way to deal with it, by specifying a list of
> directories in /var. That means that environments that want to manage
> simple mount tables with what can be shared, and how, cannot do the
> job adequately, because the shareable data is littered across several
> locations.
I recently saw another proposal on the FHS mailinglist:
/srv - data generated by users for the services the system offers
It seemed that they agreed that is was right. Isn't this just a
special case of /com and should they add /com instead?
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects
pgpR6KC0niTgr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), (continued)
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Mark Ellis, 2002/03/23
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/23
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles),
Jeroen Dekkers <=
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), B. Douglas Hilton, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25