[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
From: |
B. Douglas Hilton |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles) |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:26:29 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020310 |
Guess I'll add my 2c here.
Other alternatives:
1. Put sbin inside bin: /bin/sbin
2. Put sbin inside etc: /etc/sbin
Apps dir: /apps /local/apps
Put include inside /lib: /lib/include
or
Make a /os dir and then
/os/lib
/os/include
Really though, the *NIX directory
tree was pretty well thought out,
and these silly changes would really
only be for aesthetic purposes. I
think if the administrator wants to
modify their directory tree then
it should be their perogative.
This kind of thing is an ideal job
for a Hurdish translator. Don't like
the default tree? Make a translator
and map it however you like ;-)
However, there has to be some
kind of common scenario if you want
to be able to install a pre-rolled
package of some type.
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), (continued)
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles),
B. Douglas Hilton <=
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), B. Douglas Hilton, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/27
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26