[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
From: |
Richard Kreuter |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles) |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:08:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:08:49PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:35:29PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 10:16:06PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> I think it would be nice to post the GNU things to the mailinglist
> before they'll release the next version, which will be soon.
Okay. I don't want to speak for anybody without approval; is there
rough agreement about everything? I'll apply Thomas Bushnell's and
your corrections sometime in the next day, and post the result to this
list then.
> > 3.5.1 Grub needs its config in /boot and that should be allowed.
> > <All commentors agreed.>
>
> I'm not sure we have to specify the actually layout of /boot. I think
> you've to ask the GRUB hacker.
I believe grub's menu.lst must be in /boot/grub or /grub (the latter
to accomodate /boot partitions) on a filesystem on a partition. How
about we reword the above to
3.5.1 Grub may place its configuration file under /boot.
> > [Re: /bin] As a result, several system binaries are
> > useful to normal users and should be found in /bin:
> >
> > mkfs.*
> > mk*fs
> > *fsck
> > fsck.*
> > <...what else?>
>
> Parted and the *fdisk programs.
Got it.
Thanks,
Richard
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), (continued)
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles),
Richard Kreuter <=
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), B. Douglas Hilton, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), B. Douglas Hilton, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/27
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/26