[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
From: |
Jeroen Dekkers |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles) |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:08:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:35:29PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 10:16:06PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> >
> > I recently saw another proposal on the FHS mailinglist:
> > /srv - data generated by users for the services the system offers
> >
> > It seemed that they agreed that is was right. Isn't this just a
> > special case of /com and should they add /com instead?
>
> Maybe...according to the GNU standards, /com is for files that
> programs modify, rather than users.
I think it would be nice to post the GNU things to the mailinglist
before they'll release the next version, which will be soon.
> I've begun to integrate the agreed-upon <?> parts of the discussion
> into Mr. Dekkers's inital proposed GNU annex. Every paragraph I've
> added is prefixed with '+++', and editorial notes are enclosed in <>.
I think all things nobody commented about are right. :)
> 3.5.1 Grub needs its config in /boot and that should be allowed.
> <All commentors agreed.>
I'm not sure we have to specify the actually layout of /boot. I think
you've to ask the GRUB hacker.
> with more power than they have traditionally been afforded on Unix and
> Unix-compatible systems. As a result, several system binaries are
> useful to normal users and should be found in /bin:
>
> mkfs.*
> mk*fs
> *fsck
> fsck.*
> <...what else?>
Parted and the *fdisk programs.
> 6.2.x /sbin :
>
> Add parted.
This should move to /bin.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects
pgpnl0wVOKZOp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), (continued)
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/24
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles),
Jeroen Dekkers <=
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), B. Douglas Hilton, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), B. Douglas Hilton, 2002/03/25
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/26
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/27
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2002/03/26