Re: Poor plot performance on Windows

[Mike Miller]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:12:01 -0700, Jake wrote:
> I agree entirely. It seems like it was worst in 3.6-3.8 IIRC and got better
> in 4.0, but it's still bad.

Plotting is extremely usable in most GNU/Linux environments, which is
where Octave is primarily developed.

> I was looking at prices for MATLAB yesterday
> because it took 30-45 minutes to run the script in question when it
> should've taken a minute tops.

If spending money to fix this problem is an option, would you consider
paying a developer to work on improving Octave's plotting performance in
Windows? See http://www.octave.org/commercial_support.

-- 
mike