|
From: | Nicholas Jankowski |
Subject: | Re: Poor plot performance on Windows |
Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:32:42 -0400 |
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:12:01 -0700, Jake wrote:
> I agree entirely. It seems like it was worst in 3.6-3.8 IIRC and got better
> in 4.0, but it's still bad.
Plotting is extremely usable in most GNU/Linux environments, which is
where Octave is primarily developed.
> I was looking at prices for MATLAB yesterday
> because it took 30-45 minutes to run the script in question when it
> should've taken a minute tops.
If spending money to fix this problem is an option, would you consider
paying a developer to work on improving Octave's plotting performance in
Windows? See http://www.octave.org/commercial_support.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |