[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Poor plot performance on Windows
From: |
tmacchant |
Subject: |
Re: Poor plot performance on Windows |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:17:04 -0700 (PDT) |
>> syntax error
>>
>> >>> data = "">
>
>> What is bad for me ?
>
> I'm not sure why that one line got mangled in the web archive. The
> original message contained the line:
>
> data = profile('info');
>
> mike
Thanks it works now!
octave-4.0.0 for windows with qt graphics_toolkit
# first run
bAfter = 1
Elapsed time is 2.65053 seconds.
# Function Attr Time (s) Time (%) Calls
----------------------------------------------------------
109 __line__ 1.080 42.22 62
112 cellfun 0.525 20.54 77
29 set 0.254 9.91 184
17 get 0.131 5.13 1055
113 __go_line__ 0.112 4.38 62
117 legend 0.077 3.01 3
43 __go_axes__ 0.042 1.64 2
133 findobj 0.042 1.64 2
10 ishandle 0.037 1.45 114
129 __go_text__ 0.019 0.74 33
# second run
bAfter = 1
Elapsed time is 2.21999 seconds.
# Function Attr Time (s) Time (%) Calls
-------------------------------------------------------------------
103 __line__ 1.063 48.39 62
106 cellfun 0.515 23.47 77
20 set 0.239 10.89 179
107 __go_line__ 0.112 5.10 62
111 legend 0.032 1.46 3
34 legend>deletelegend1 0.029 1.30 1
128 __go_text__ 0.020 0.91 33
12 get 0.019 0.87 1092
132 findobj 0.018 0.82 2
66 repmat 0.011 0.50 52
On octave cygwin64 on the same PC
First run
bAfter = 1
Elapsed time is 4.68298 seconds.
# Function Attr Time (s) Time (%) Calls
----------------------------------------------------------
109 __line__ 1.349 30.57 62
112 cellfun 0.641 14.53 77
17 get 0.585 13.25 1055
29 set 0.292 6.61 184
43 __go_axes__ 0.248 5.62 2
113 __go_line__ 0.114 2.58 62
117 legend 0.092 2.09 3
133 findobj 0.085 1.93 2
93 __plt__ 0.082 1.86 16
62 num2str 0.077 1.74 32
Second run
bAfter = 1
Elapsed time is 2.72489 seconds.
# Function Attr Time (s) Time (%) Calls
---------------------------------------------------------------
103 __line__ 1.319 48.90 62
106 cellfun 0.634 23.50 77
20 set 0.243 9.02 179
107 __go_line__ 0.099 3.68 62
12 get 0.049 1.81 1092
111 legend 0.040 1.50 3
33 __go_axes_init__ 0.039 1.45 1
132 findobj 0.024 0.89 2
54 num2str 0.018 0.66 32
128 __go_text__ 0.018 0.65 33
The values of Time are similar to those in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-octave/2016-03/msg00045.html
Perhaps plot in 4.0.0 is slower than that in 3.2.x.
However, this issue seem to be irrelevant to the critical slowness that
happened
in some windows environments.
Tatsuro
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Poor-plot-performance-on-Windows-tp4675531p4675581.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, (continued)
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Jens.Wulf, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Jake, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Marco Atzeri, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Mike Miller, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Marco Atzeri, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, tmacchant, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Mike Miller, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows,
tmacchant <=
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, tmacchant, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Mike Miller, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Mike Miller, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Jake, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Mike Miller, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Jake, 2016/03/16