[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages
From: |
Daniel Pocock |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:18:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 |
On 29/02/16 11:10, Fabio Pesari wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 10:54 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>> "Have you ever had a program that didn't just work exactly the way you
>> wanted though?"
>
> "Yes, but that also happens with FOSS programs. Even if a program is
> open and in theory I could modify it, I can't program, so it's the same."
>
> or
>
> "Even so, from my experience, proprietary programs always work better
> than FOSS ones. I work in web design and GIMP can't still open PSD files
> properly after so many years, and lacks many features (like
> content-aware fill) compared to it."
>
>> "If a program appears to `just work' but has a data leak, is it really
>> working?"
>
> "If it does what I want then yes, who cares? Everybody is being spied on
> anyway, and I have nothing to hide."
>
Very good, but not every person will respond like that
Do you feel that the idea of making up questions like this is useful in
comparison to just having statements to use as responses?
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, (continued)
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Yui Hirasawa, 2016/02/28
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Daniel Pocock, 2016/02/28
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Jim Procter, 2016/02/28
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Michael Lamb, 2016/02/28
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, J.B. Nicholson, 2016/02/28
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Fabio Pesari, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Daniel Pocock, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Fabio Pesari, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Daniel Pocock, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Fabio Pesari, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages,
Daniel Pocock <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Fabio Pesari, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Daniel Pocock, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Fabio Pesari, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Daniel Pocock, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Paul M, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Fabio Pesari, 2016/02/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, aurelien, 2016/02/29
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Fabio Pesari, 2016/02/28
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Proposal for "FUD responses" wiki pages, Yui Hirasawa, 2016/02/29