[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: “Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed?
From: |
Miles Fidelman |
Subject: |
Re: “Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:50:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.5 |
Re. proprietary software: Just remember, "Code is Law."
Miles Fidelman
Jim wrote:
On 3/25/21 3:33 PM, Danny Spitzberg wrote:
Interesting perspective, worth engaging with. It covers everything from
the term free/libre and beer, to Microsoft and IEC 62304, to not
getting credit and reactionary attitudes.
“Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed
[1]Robert M. Lefkowitz
Almost forty years ago, in 1985, the idea of “Free Software” was born.
...
It's always good to hear criticism; it keeps us on our toes and honest.
I actually think this is as great a time for software freedom as ever.
Personally I am a "user" who is not a developer, programmer, or
sysadmin. I use Free Software because I feel respected as a user.
Some years ago my wife asked me "What precisely is the harm in using
proprietary software?" This caused me to think very carefully, and I
actually unearthed some of the concepts the author mentioned. And
also, of what value is software freedom to a non-programmer? I posted
my thoughts here:
[1][1]https://internetperdition.wordpress.com/2016/09/18/seek-freedom-not-
permission/
The author refers to "political" software but I would say that all
transactions involve power (and if you're not watching for power
dynamics everywhere all the time then wise up!). And we have negotiate
power relationships when we procure things we need. When I buy a
pencil, my relationship with the manufacturer is very limited, so the
power concerns are minimal; when I buy a car I have a limited ongoing
relationship with the manufacturer, but still the car company has
limited power to coerce me after the sale. I can go to third-party
dealers, roads are roads, etc. Software, however, is so complex that
the possibilities for coercion are limited by engineers' creativity.
The means of consumer protection, from least protective to most, are as
follows:
1. Government regulation
2. Market competition
3. Open standards for files and protocols (to prevent vendor lock-in)
4. Available source code with full rights and capabilities to fork
(software freedom)
The author can call me a conspiracy theorist but I don't have regrets
about adopting the most protective regime available. Maybe it's more
protection than I need, but I don't have to be constantly deciding how
much protection I need.
I see some trends that suggest an opening from Free Software, if we can
take advantage of them. Concern /disgust with surveillance is growing,
as is distrust of Big Tech. "Open source" used to get all the media
hype but I think the sense has grown that that movement cares nothing
for ethics or users, it's a vehicle for Big Tech and Big Tech
wannabe's. There's an appetite for a line of products and a software
stack that "respects your freedom" if it is convenient to use and
integrated. People *do* want to be respected! They just don't know
where to find it, and they don't want to have to assemble it.
Now to edit this down and post comments to the author....
Jim Garrett
References
1. [2]https://internetperdition.wordpress.com/2016/09/18/seek-freedom-not-per
mission/
_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
[3]libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
[4]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Theory is when you know everything but nothing works.
Practice is when everything works but no one knows why.
In our lab, theory and practice are combined:
nothing works and no one knows why. ... unknown
References
1. https://internetperdition.wordpress.com/2016/09/18/seek-freedom-not
2.
https://internetperdition.wordpress.com/2016/09/18/seek-freedom-not-permission/
3. mailto:libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
4. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
- “Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed?, Danny Spitzberg, 2021/03/26
- Re: “Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed?, Jean Louis, 2021/03/27
- Re: “Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed?, Quiliro Ordóñez, 2021/03/27
- Re: “Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed?, al3xu5, 2021/03/29
- Re: “Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed?, Jim, 2021/03/29
- Re: “Free Software”: An idea whose time has passed?, Matt Ivie, 2021/03/31