[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address
From: |
David Mosberger-Tang |
Subject: |
Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:47:53 -0600 |
On 8/16/07, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm trying to read the TOC (.opd) section from Elf file.
> The major problem is that this table in filled in runtime by the loader,
Ah, I was afraid you were going to say that... ;-)
> I really think I need the address space in function... do you think this
> would be a big problem?
No, we could definitely handle it by giving new names to the changed
functions. However, come to think of it, this is probably something
we can handle with library and/or name-versioning. Since we're just
talking about changes interfaces within two libunwind-libraries, the
risk of there being a problem is small anyhow.
So, my suggestion would be that you work up a patch that adds the
address-space argument and I'll then worry about the versioning magic
needed to ensure there is no ABI breakage.
--david
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, (continued)
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, David Mosberger-Tang, 2007/08/10
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, Jose Flavio, 2007/08/14
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, David Mosberger-Tang, 2007/08/14
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, Jose Flavio, 2007/08/14
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino, 2007/08/15
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, David Mosberger-Tang, 2007/08/15
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino, 2007/08/16
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino, 2007/08/16
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address,
David Mosberger-Tang <=
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2007/08/16
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Function Address, David Mosberger-Tang, 2007/08/16