[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching stable/2.22?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: branching stable/2.22? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:10:01 +0200 (CEST) |
>> This is not my proposal anymore to just branch, but Han-Wen's idea
>> of having a freeze of 3-4 weeks before branching.
>
> For me, a freeze can only start if we agree that nothing fundamental
> has to be changed or added. IMHO, we are far away from such a
> state.
What we can start, however, is a feature freeze, especially
syntax-wise. So if you mean exactly that, I support that idea.
Werner
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, (continued)
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/04
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/05
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/06
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/06
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/06
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, David Kastrup, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, James Lowe, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Dan Eble, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/13