[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching stable/2.22?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: branching stable/2.22? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:59:53 +0200 |
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:28 AM Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> wrote:
>
> > >> Similarly, if I change a documentation string in an SCM file like
> > >> `define-markup-commands.scm`, the documentation doesn't get
> > >> rebuilt, either.
> > >
> > > I can look at reintroducing the SCM -> texi dependencies.
> >
> > Please do so. Due to the auto-generation process, it is far from
> > trivial to find out which command has to be called.
>
> Actually, I value faster incremental builds that sometimes does less
> over wasting my time always regenerating the internals manual whenever
> I happen to touch an SCM file. Just doing
> $ rm Documentation/out*/en/internals.texi
> will update it, no need to remember any command.
I see the value of faster builds, but I think being correct is more
important than being fast.
What annoys me is that the default build creates the info docs, which
aren't necessary for developing lilypond.
> Jonas
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, (continued)
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, James Lowe, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Dan Eble, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Dan Eble, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, David Kastrup, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, James Lowe, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Thomas Morley, 2020/09/06