[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching stable/2.22?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: branching stable/2.22? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Sep 2020 06:42:00 +0200 (CEST) |
>> [...] if I delete a PDF file, say, `notation.pdf`, right now it
>> gets *not* rebuilt!
>
> The new documentation build has much more accurate dependency
> tracking, so if you want to rebuild notation.pdf, you can just say
> so:
>
> make out=www out-www/en/notation.pdf
Aah, I tried without `out=www`. This incantation is good enough for
me, thanks. No further action needed.
>> Similarly, if I change a documentation string in an SCM file like
>> `define-markup-commands.scm`, the documentation doesn't get
>> rebuilt, either.
>
> I can look at reintroducing the SCM -> texi dependencies.
Please do so. Due to the auto-generation process, it is far from
trivial to find out which command has to be called.
>> I consider this fundamental flaws.
>
> I disagree. These flaws might be a bother for developers, but
> branching stable/2.22 is about not having user-visible regressions
> of lilypond itself, relative to 2.20, which has nothing to do with
> how developers experience working on lilypond.
OK.
>> For me, a freeze can only start if we agree that nothing
>> fundamental has to be changed or added. IMHO, we are far away from
>> such a state.
>
> Could you enumerate the issues you think are fundamental?
Well, I referred mainly to the build problems. Since your goal to cut
stable/2.22 is a bit different my arguments are moot.
Werner
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, (continued)
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, David Kastrup, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, James Lowe, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Dan Eble, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Dan Eble, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, David Kastrup, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, James Lowe, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Thomas Morley, 2020/09/06