[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching stable/2.22?
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: branching stable/2.22? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:28:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.36.5 |
Am Samstag, den 12.09.2020, 06:42 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> >> [...] if I delete a PDF file, say, `notation.pdf`, right now it
> >> gets *not* rebuilt!
> >
> > The new documentation build has much more accurate dependency
> > tracking, so if you want to rebuild notation.pdf, you can just say
> > so:
> >
> > make out=www out-www/en/notation.pdf
>
> Aah, I tried without `out=www`. This incantation is good enough for
> me, thanks. No further action needed.
Actually that's the same as before, no? Deleting from offline-root and
such will not get the file rebuilt, but I think that's not different
from the previous scheme.
> >> Similarly, if I change a documentation string in an SCM file like
> >> `define-markup-commands.scm`, the documentation doesn't get
> >> rebuilt, either.
> >
> > I can look at reintroducing the SCM -> texi dependencies.
>
> Please do so. Due to the auto-generation process, it is far from
> trivial to find out which command has to be called.
Actually, I value faster incremental builds that sometimes does less
over wasting my time always regenerating the internals manual whenever
I happen to touch an SCM file. Just doing
$ rm Documentation/out*/en/internals.texi
will update it, no need to remember any command.
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, (continued)
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, David Kastrup, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, James Lowe, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Dan Eble, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?,
Jonas Hahnfeld <=
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/12
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Dan Eble, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, David Kastrup, 2020/09/13
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, James Lowe, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/11
- Re: branching stable/2.22?, Thomas Morley, 2020/09/06