Re: Frescobaldi, improve support for audio export

[Urs Liska]

Am 21. Oktober 2019 18:52:29 MESZ schrieb Saul Tobin <address@hidden>:
>Would the bundled VLC be redundant to an existing system install of
>VLC?
>Would it be usable instead of a system install? Would the bundled VLC
>get
>updates?

As I've said several times in this thread *bundling* anything with Frescobaldi 
is not what we are talking about here.

Urs

>
>I normally have VLC installed anyway, but I'd rather not have to keep a
>separate copy on disk just for Frescobaldi.
>
>
>On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 10:33 PM Federico Bruni <address@hidden>
>wrote:
>
>> Il giorno ven 18 ott 2019 alle 23:14, J Martin Rushton via
>> lilypond-user <address@hidden> ha scritto:
>> > There is a VLC available through flatpack, but I've not used it (so
>> > therefore cannot comment), but have seen warnings that it will pull
>in
>> > up to 1.2 GiB of other packages including the complete KDE
>> > implementation.
>>
>> $ flatpak info org.videolan.VLC | grep 'Installed'
>>    Installed: 77,7 MB
>>
>> $ flatpak info org.kde.Platform//5.13 | grep Installed
>>    Installed: 910,3 MB
>>
>> The KDE runtime may be used by other Qt applications installed in
>your
>> system.
>>
>> You may want to read this post by the author of Flatpak:
>>
>>
>https://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2017/10/02/on-application-sizes-and-bloat-in-flatpak/
>>
>> In a nutshell: Flatpak is a bundling system and as such it requires
>> more disk space, but the benefits (of shipping a self-contained and
>> independent application) may offset the cost for some people,
>> especially today (as large disks are smaller and cheaper). The
>article
>> explains how ostree helps in reducing the duplication between similar
>> runtimes.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.