Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL

[Hans Åberg]

> On 30 Oct 2019, at 22:14, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>>    The snippets should be LGPL for being includable under other licenses, I 
>> believe, because the processed part remains in the output, and thus 
>> copyrightable. Thus, they play the same role as the Bison skeleton file and 
>> GCC libraries.
> 
> What processed part remains in the output?

The part of them that one includes in ones own code, if large enough to be 
copyrightable. If you just look at them and write something else, it does not 
matter.