[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch?
From: |
Frédéric L . W . Meunier |
Subject: |
Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)) |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:31:29 -0200 (BRST) |
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>
> > Well, I'm now downloading
> > http://www.flora.org/lynx-dev/mailbox/ , but have no idea how
> > we'd incorporate http://www.flora.org/lynx-dev/lynx-dev/ .
> > Aren't there mbox archives for these ?
>
> OK, spam free (if you find one, let me know) archives for 2002
> and 2003 at http://www.pervalidus.net/lynx-dev/ . More to come.
Almost done. Now we have spam free archives for 2000-January
2004.
I don't think there was much in 1997-1999, but the traffic was
much higher.
Spam free archives:
2000: 11,886,745
2001: 4,335,812
2002: 5,318,695
2003: 3,769,946
To go through in the next days:
1997: 22,791,578
1998: 20,804,117
1999: 28,436,304
Does that mean Lynx is dying ? :-)
I think once we're done we can ask FLORA.org to redirect
everything under http://www.flora.org/lynx-dev/ to the main
page of the new archives.
--
http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), (continued)
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Doug Kaufman, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Henry Nelson, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)),
Frédéric L . W . Meunier <=
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), SP-BEI, 2004/02/05
- lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/06
- Re: lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/07
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- lynx-dev Re: mailing-list problem, Thorsten Glaser, 2004/02/05
- Re: lynx-dev Re: mailing-list problem, Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), David Woolley, 2004/02/05