[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:12:12 -0700 |
> From: address@hidden (Matt Birkholz)
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:08:59 -0700
>
> [...]
>
> DO NOT USE except for evaluation purposes. I may want to toss it and
> start again, depending on your feedback. The reason: I flattened the
> directory structure in CVS somewhat.
Oh nevermind. A large number of files are missing.
git-cvsimport/cvsps must be dropping a LOT of revisions! The
grumbling about
WARNING: revision ... on unnamed branch
and
Argument "6521 FNK_SHOW_ALL" isn't numeric ...
in my logs is apparently a show-stopper, if not a program stopper.
This must be the "heuristics" problem Chris mentioned. The
inaccessible revisions were just a red herring. I can patch the
second hiccup and try again tonight, but...
This Gordian Knot is just axing for an axing. I am replacing the
repo. at
git://birkholz.chandler.az.us/mit-scheme.cgi
with one that simply tracks CVS HEAD, committing daily at Zero hundred
Zulu. I am still using the squashed directory layout and including
ChangeLogs.
History is dust.
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/25
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/04/25
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/25
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/04/26
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/26
- Message not available
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/27
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/27
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/28
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/28
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/29
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?,
Matt Birkholz <=