[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push
From: |
Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:27:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/7.7.90.+ |
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:21:18 -0700
From: Chris Hanson <address@hidden>
Some basic discussion in case you haven't seen it:
http://www.gnu.org/software/mit-scheme/documentation/mit-scheme-user/In_002dline-Coding.html#In_002dline-Coding
I've seen that, but it doesn't say that the declarations can change
the semantics of a program. At the very least, it should have a big
scary warning to say that. I always assumed that SF would perform the
transformation only when it could prove that it wouldn't change the
program's semantics (i.e. only for movable operand expressions).
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/10
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/11
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/12
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/19
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/19
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push,
Taylor R Campbell <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/19
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/19
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/20
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/20
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/20
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/20
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/20
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/20