Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push

[Chris Hanson]

It's hard to use a wrapper interface for transcripts, since it's
usually an existing port that the user wants to record.

I suppose we could change the repl to start a nested level when
turning on the transcript (think the script command in unix).  That
might work.

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden> wrote:
>   Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:14:51 -0700
>   From: Joe Marshall <address@hidden>
>
>   I think moving the transcript port from the property list to the port
>   itself would be worthwhile because this call chain happens a lot.  It
>   would make ports a little bit bigger, but I don't think that's enough
>   to worry about.
>
> I'm not particularly concerned about the size of ports, although I
> wonder whether it would be better to do transcripts at a different
> layer if we want to do them at all, as a wrapper around ports.  For
> that matter, does anyone ever actually use the transcript feature?
>