mit-scheme-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push


From: Taylor R Campbell
Subject: Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] two changes to push
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:44:22 -0400
User-agent: IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/7.7.90.+

   Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:14:51 -0700
   From: Joe Marshall <address@hidden>

   I think moving the transcript port from the property list to the port
   itself would be worthwhile because this call chain happens a lot.  It
   would make ports a little bit bigger, but I don't think that's enough
   to worry about.

I'm not particularly concerned about the size of ports, although I
wonder whether it would be better to do transcripts at a different
layer if we want to do them at all, as a wrapper around ports.  For
that matter, does anyone ever actually use the transcript feature?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]