mldonkey-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mldonkey-users] Server black list


From: Brett Dikeman
Subject: Re: [Mldonkey-users] Server black list
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:41:06 -0500

At 5:18 PM -0500 12/13/02, Stephane Goulet wrote:

CIDR is indeed nice ;)

Still i think some kind of : filter_non_routable_adresses option would have
it's place with the black list ;)

I disagree. There are a few cases where NOT filtering non-routeable addresses would be highly desirable.

For example, lets say you're a company that wants to distribute a training video across a corporate network with many branches, where the distributed nature of the edonkey protocol would have strong advantages. That private network is almost guaranteed to be in a non-routeable IP range.

My opinion is that the best option would be to supply the default downloads.ini with a blacklist populated with all the standard non-routeable IP ranges specified in CIDR format. That way, the user can remove their private net(s) if they need to.

Considering that in CIDR format you only need a few entries to specify all the non-routeable ranges...

Brett
--



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]