[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-users] Re: banning emule?
From: |
Sven Hartge |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-users] Re: banning emule? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Dec 2002 01:41:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.14-20020926 ("Soil") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-112 (i586)) |
Logi <address@hidden> wrote:
> I myself have no problems downloading from Emules (see stats at end of
> post) but if others experience difficulties I think the right way is to
> analyse why and solve the problem.
> Stupid banning does nothing but to give MLDonkey a bad name.
Right. Since eMules are a big part of the net today, no wonder they
download much. Intereseting figure would be the number of bytes devides
by the number of clients seen for each brand.
BTW: Did anybody see any old eMules in the net recently? I think this
brand can be safely removed from the stats.
Uptime: 87700 seconds (1+00:21)
Total seens: 7360
eDonkey: 663 (9.01 %)
old mldonkey: 745 (10.12 %)
new mldonkey: 3951 (53.68 %)
Overnet: 53 (0.72 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 1948 (26.47 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total filerequests received: 169327
eDonkey: 4270 (2.52 %)
old mldonkey: 23694 (13.99 %)
new mldonkey: 89922 (53.11 %)
Overnet: 17407 (10.28 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 34034 (20.10 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total downloads: 398950161
eDonkey: 169577640 (42.51 %)
old mldonkey: 6690816 (1.68 %)
new mldonkey: 45966597 (11.52 %)
Overnet: 131990165 (33.08 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 44724943 (11.21 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total uploads: 313939968
eDonkey: 150581748 (47.97 %)
old mldonkey: 0 (0.00 %)
new mldonkey: 59262720 (18.88 %)
Overnet: 11270144 (3.59 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 92825356 (29.57 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total banneds: 15
eDonkey: 3 (20.00 %)
old mldonkey: 0 (0.00 %)
new mldonkey: 5 (33.33 %)
Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 7 (46.67 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
S°
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
50: Version x.1
Kostenpflichtiger Bugfix (Kristian Köhntopp)
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, (continued)
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Marc, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Stephane Goulet, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, schorsch_dabbelju, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Stephane Goulet, 2002/12/28
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Martin, 2002/12/28
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, crazee_canuck, 2002/12/29
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, gfdsa, 2002/12/29
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Marc, 2002/12/28
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Stephane Goulet, 2002/12/28
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, gfdsa, 2002/12/29
[Mldonkey-users] Re: banning emule?,
Sven Hartge <=
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: banning emule?, Michael Panteleit, 2002/12/27
Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, Logi, 2002/12/26