|
From: | Jorge Nerin |
Subject: | Re: [Mldonkey-users] MySQL |
Date: | Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:51:33 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Falk Hueffner wrote:
Well, I think we need the first one, in fact we need it badly, mldonkey it's know to overcommit a lot and get OOM killed frecuently.Hi, Databases are optimized for: * Datasets much larger than memory * Atomical commits with rollback * Concurrent access none of which we need in the slightest for mldonkey; therefore, using a database seems like a really bad idea to me. It would just bloat the system without any gains.
The second one could be handy, not needed, but nice to have.About being concurrent... perhaps you could make a "cluster" of donkeys this way without interfering each other (very far future, but technically possible with a database)
-- Jorge Nerin <address@hidden>
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |