[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?)
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?) |
Date: |
Fri, 16 May 2003 08:28:43 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.1 |
On Fri 16 May 2003 06:08, Frank Van Damme posted as excerpted below:
> btw, having 100000 articles in separate files is no big deal with a
> filesystem like reiserfs, but with fat it is going to eat space like crazy
> (16 or even 32 Kbyte cluster size).
No kidding! Even the 1K block sizes of ext2/3 eat it some. I run reiserfs on
all my (Linux) partitions. I just booted back to DOS/MSWormOS for the first
time in months, auto-updated Lose98, and then returned to DOS mode to run
Partition Magic to move a few legacy FAT32 partitions around and make it so I
could take out my oldest hd, a 7G. I haven't actually removed it yet, but
it's disabled in BIOS now, and I have to remove it b4 the latest LILO upgrade
will update my bootsector.
The latest LILO apparently added a new check for serial numbers, and It says
the first partition on that and the main MSWormOS drive, 27G I think (the
Linux drive I use now is the newest, 100G), have the same serial number, and
refuses to continue. That's not surprising, since I copied the partition off
the old one to the new one using Partition Magic. I've been thinking it's
time to consolidate the legacy FAT partitions on a single drive, since I've
deleted a bunch of old proprietary-ware stuff and there's room to do it, so
this is the opportunity to do that, rather than fooling around with the
serial numbers. I noticed even b4 I switched off of MSWormOS that the oldest
drive was hesitating sometimes when I went to read stuff off it, and it seems
to take forever now to wake up out of suspend mode since I don't use it that
much, so I might as well get it off my system, rather than mucking around
with the serial numbers on it.
Anyway, I hadn't had to deal with cluster sizes in ages, using reiserfs, so
that refreshed the evils of FAT, even FAT32, in my mind. <g>
(I'm keeping the old MSWormOS Lose98 around, with little more than the OS
itself, for testing purposes. It's handy to have a second OS to boot to, in
case you TOTALLY fudge up your first one, especially if like me you are
running beta (Mdk Cooker) all the time. That way I can switch primary drives
in BIOS and boot from the MSWormOS drive to jump on the web and find out how
to fix whatever Linux problem, if I need to. Additionally, as I said, it's
handy for testing whether hardware problems are actually hardware or just
kernel module and configuration issues. If it works in MSWormOS, I know it
can't be hardware. However, the MSWormOS side goes months between boots, and
I'll probably be dropping it for good when I switch to Linux on i86-64, later
this year, if things go well. I'm hoping to go with a dual CPU board, altho
I'll run single processor originally, until I scrape more $$ together for the
second round of upgrades.)
--
Duncan
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
- [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?), Michael Vondung, 2003/05/14
- [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?), Michael Vondung, 2003/05/14
- Re: [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?), Jim Reiss, 2003/05/14
- Re: [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?), Duncan, 2003/05/14
- Re: [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?), Frank Van Damme, 2003/05/16
- Re: [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?), Duncan, 2003/05/16
- Re: [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2003/05/16
- Re: [Pan-users] "Automatic" unsubscription (bug?), Jim Reiss, 2003/05/17