Re: [Pan-users] cache NNTPMessage from localhost

[Thufir]

On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:43:29 +0000, Duncan wrote:

>> Another direction is to just keep the socket to Leafnode open, and then
>> if it gets closed inadvertently, just open a new connection.  Does that
>> seem at all reasonable?  I would prefer to deal with individual
>> messages only at the level of NNTPMessage.
> 
> I still don't know anything beyond what's in your message about
> NNTPMessage, but the idea in general appears to me to be sound.  Long
> term socket connections, ESPECIALLY localhost only, should "just work".
> If they don't, there's something else seriously wrong.
>

Thanks, that helps put me in the right direction.  I was starting to go 
down the path of storing these messages into a custom Java @Entity, and 
then that naturally leads to a database...total overkill.


-Thufir