Re: [Sks-devel] Debian binary replacement

[John Clizbe]

John Clizbe wrote:
> 
> Jens told me about his success with cryptokit-1.5 a couple days after I pushed
> my own work with 1.3. OCaml is frightening enough to the unitinitated. There
> is no point adding another build complexity to SKS unless it is a) trivial, or
> b) worth it. Read the Changlog for cryptokit-1.5. There's not a lot of bang
> there from 1.3 to 1.5. I have already said, if cryptokit-1.5 can be added
> easily for *all* SKS users, it will be.

I said if I found a trivial way to add cryptokit-1.5 support I would upgrade
SKS to use it.

I did and I did.

Neener Neener,

-John

PS: If lucky, the only build dependencies we'll have to add is whatever it
takes for thread/concurrency support.