|
| From: | Gabor Kiss |
| Subject: | Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing? |
| Date: | Sat, 26 May 2012 07:58:59 +0200 (CEST) |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
> Is there really a need to carry around every expired signature forever > from a robo-signer? > Should/could some of the expired signatures be actively filtered (and > archived) > instead of being carried in SKS key servers forever? Yes a policy change > like this would be controversial and difficult to deploy. I agree. g
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |