Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?

[Jeffrey Johnson]

On May 27, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Jens Leinenbach wrote:

> Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> That has been discussed previously, and I am, at least personally very
>> much against it. There are good reasons to keep historical data on the
>> keyservers in order to increase security.
> 
> I am against a filtering infrastructure, too. This just causes more
> trouble like that:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/sks-devel/2010-09/msg00009.html
> (Peter Pramberger's key deletion trouble.)
> 

Again: the filtering is on an expired signature, not a public key
that cannot be stored legally in certain countries.

73 de Jeff