[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?
From: |
Story Henry |
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:26:25 +0100 |
On 24 Mar 2010, at 23:21, Henry Litwhiler wrote:
> On 3/24/10 6:14 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2010/3/24 Matt Lee <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>
>> I'd like to see a discussion on which PHP framework we should be
>> using,
>> if any.
>>
>> Symfony 2.0 -- http://symfony-reloaded.org/ is one that has
>> already been
>> mentioned.
>>
>>
>> Yes this seems to be probably the leading candidate from our research too.
>>
>> http://fatfree.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> Was mentioned on #irc too
>>
>> Would be interested to see the thoughts of others ...
>>
> While PHP could be a very good tool for displaying data and providing an
> interface with GNU Social, I feel that it might be worth considering making
> the "core" GNU Social application a desktop one that would perhaps interface
> with an existing, standardized stack (LAMP, etc.) to serve the files to other
> users' web browsers. The (Python? C?) desktop application could include basic
> setting options, but would probably be mainly just something running in the
> background, keeping the server/p2p connections live.
If you work at the semantic web layer of abstraction, it does not matter what
kind of application reads your data: a web app, a thick client app, or agents
with no user interface at all.
See the work that from the semantic desktop comminuty [1] is being incorporated
by KDE.
It'a all data, and the data is on the web.
Henry
[1] http://www.semanticdesktop.org/
http://nepomuk.semanticdesktop.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main1/
>
> --
> Henry L.
Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?, Steven DuBois, 2010/03/24