Re: [Social-discuss] Which framework?

[Ted Smith]

On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 15:10 -0400, Matt Lee wrote:
> On 03/25/10 13:04, Ted Smith wrote:
> 
> > I fully agree with this - I see GNU Social as most optimally having a
> > server daemon that does "real work" whatever that is, with UI's in
> > various languages/models (web UI, GTK/Qt/Whatever UI, etc.). GNUnet does
> > this, and I think it's the right choice.
> 
> GNUnet is not a good choice and it immediately breaks the design goal of
> having this run on commodity webhosting.
> 
> That's why having it work in PHP with a minimal database is key.
> 

I meant as a design model, not as an actual system that could be
modified to build GNU Social.

Though, if we're targeting end-users machines and building a p2p
network, do we really care about commodity webhosting? (Probably.)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part